So I put Subrogation to the test. I think I may have made a mistake though…

So yesterday (May 7th 2019) I put Subrogation to the test. I used the document that is talked about in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMwaABDQGs8

So my issue with Subrogation has nothing to do with actually executing my right of Subrogation, however it has to do more with court tactics, and my response to the court tactics. Yesterday (May 7th 2019) I went into court. I put my document on the record on April 24th 2019. I made sure the clerk put it in the record for the judge, and the prosecuter to read.

Here's the first problem: I don't know how many of you are familiar with this court tactic, however, I've been on two cases now where the prosecuter is sitting near the entrance of the court room. He's calling people by number and having them plead at his table, rather than in front of the judge. He fills out their pleading on a piece of paper, and attaches the pleading to the individuals court documents. Once the judge pulls the individual's court document, he sees the pleading and proceeds accordingly. I'm assuming this is a tactic to protect the judge from being embarassed in front of the public.

Here's my issue: When my number was called, I showed the prosecuter my Subrogation document, and he looked at it and immediately froze while reading it. He was really talkative prior to me coming to his table, yet when I showed him the document he was completely silent. I told him that I put this document on the record on the 24th of April. He gets up from the table and walks over to the judge's bench and grabs my file. He comes back to his table and confirms that he sees my document has been put on the record, and then tells me to sit and the judge will call me. So I'm like ok, cool. The judge calls me to the bench and he tells me that they're going to reschedule my hearing and put in a court order for the police officer to show up. He mumbled something about a trial. Believe me, he was talking really low.

I know that I could've handled it then and there at the arraignment, however I wasn't sure if it was necessary to handle it there at the arraignment. It was my first time doing this. I was so caught up in my thoughts of defending my document that I agreed to the rescheduling without thinking. Plain and simple, I didn't know what to expect after they would realize that I knew they had a fiduciary duty they were obligated to.

Here's my question(s): If they're trying to strategically place me into a typical admiralty trial where I'll be arguing my case against the cop, can I interrupt that trial (since I have a month until the new court appearance), by way of motions and get them to honor my BIll of Complaint in Equity? I'm also pretty much done with my studies on filing my own lawsuits. Do you think its possible that I can file a complaint for conspiracy, and breach of trust if they try to go forward with this? The way I see it, my document was already on the record from the start. I don't believe there's any way they can logically explain why someone who placed that type of document on the record, would then turn and agree to an admiralty trial. They knew what I was coming there to do, and they can't really prove that they didn't know what I was coming there to do since my document has long been on the record.

Any help or thoughts on this matter would be greatly appreciated. I have a month until I have to deal with them again.